A A
RSS

Not letting go of public records

By Steve McClure on Wed, Apr 29, 2009

Featured

I’m usually better at simply letting things go, but the Moscow council’s decision to increase charges on public records requests that it considers large is more than a little troublesome. It’s about the public’s right to access information on its government, and councilmembers should have thought a bit more before they dropped a fee that could price people right out of access.

In Moscow, that’s playing out right now — even though the council went ahead with its ill-conceived fee schedule. It’s a schedule that’s designed with a specific individual in mind, and that’s not right.

In looking at the issue, we decided to find out how many records requests the city receives. It just seemed a natural question, especially since part of the justification for the fee increase was the pressure it puts on city staff.

From March 1 through April 21, the city of Moscow received 57 public records requests (58 if you count the one we filed to get the records requests). Most of those, 45, were filed with the police department in order to obtain police reports.

Of the remaining 12, four were from a single individual who wanted video files of the council meetings, one was for copies of council meeting minutes, five were from Wayne Fox — the individual who appears to be at the center of the public records fee flap — and a couple others were for miscellaneous items (including one request from someone who wanted to see what Wayne Fox’s records requests said).

To be fair, the city is not the only agency that utilizes that tactic. Council members should, however, be aware of how these fees are used. Here’s a current example. We’re working through another records request right now in which the state agency, after stalling beyond what is statutorily allowed, dropped us a letter saying we’d have to fork over some cash before it will begin processing our request. As a business that puts a premium on obtaining access to those documents, we’ll continue to press forward.

But the public records law isn’t designed just for news organizations. It’s designed so everyday people can find out what people are doing (or not doing) on their behalf. There’s no language in the law that says it’s there for reporters or residents of a jurisdiction. It’s for the public period.

The council needs to rethink its decision before it travels too far down a road that ultimately shuts residents out of the process.

 

Tags:

0 Comments For This Post

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. The public record hammer | Moscow-Pullman Daily News Blogs Says:

    [...] You can read my previous post here [...]

Leave a Reply

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video
Robb Akey Press Conference Part II

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video
Part I of Robb Akey’s Sept. 30 press conference

The second part of WSU football coach Paul Wulff’s press conference Sept. 23

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

The first part of WSU football coach Paul Wulff’s Sept. 23 press conference

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Take a look at the new printing facility for the Moscow-Pullman Daily News and Lewiston Tribune.

Categories